Laura M. Fabrycky:

While they may never properly iron linen table napkins, children and adults alike gain much from cultivating the skills required to bring livable order to ordinary chaos. It is a balm to have that skill in one’s pocket, not because it exercises proto-dominance on an indifferent universe, but because it can also bring clarity and calm to one’s cluttered interior. It mirrors exactly what thinking effects. Yet why is it bestselling brilliance for psychologist Jordan Peterson to say “make your bed,' but not when your mother teaches you to do it?

This essay, and its references, reminded me a lot of Mary Catherine Bateson’s Peripheral Visions, which I’m also freshly reminded was one of the best books I’ve ever read.

To be resigned or hopeful, calculated or surprised — Jürgen Moltmann

Pure Joy

Phil Klay:

When I see people who have never set foot in Russia or Ukraine or Gaza or Israel, with no family ties to those countries, spouting the propaganda of foreign lands, I wonder whether I am witnessing the genuine adoption of an identity or a consumer for whom sampling the spice of nationalist fervour is just one of the commercial choices you’re offered when you purchase a cell phone that connects to the internet.

Erin Plunkett’s essay “Temporal Houses, Eternal Mysteries: Leaving the Faith, Seeking Faith” is a wonderful biographical extension of something Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Simone Weil (and others, like Christian Wiman, who has often quoted both of these) were getting at when they spoke of, in Weil’s description, a second kind, or a second aspect, of atheism.

Here’s Bonhoeffer, writing to his friend Eberhard Bethge, April 30th, 1944:

I often wonder why my “Christian instinct” frequently draws me more toward nonreligious people than toward the religious, and I am sure it’s not with missionary intent; instead, I’d almost call it a “brotherly” instinct.

I wonder whenever I read that letter whether Bonhoeffer thought of scratching out the “almost.” He goes on to say that the use of religious terminology, and even the naming of God, has become a source of confusion and anxiety for him — when it is done among religious people.

Here’s Weil:

A case of contradictories which are true. God exists: God does not exist. Where is the problem? I am quite sure that there is a God in the sense that I am quite sure my love is not illusory. I am quite sure that there is not a God in the sense that I am quite sure nothing real can be anything like what I am able to conceive when I pronounce this word. But that which I cannot conceive is not an illusion.

There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God.

[…]

Religion in so far as it is a source of consolation is a hindrance to true faith: in this sense atheism is a purification.

My own experience is not as extreme as Plunketts’s, but I wrote a little about my experience with Bonhoeffer’s “almost-brotherhood of secularity” a few years ago. I’m probably due for an update to this thinking, but I don’t think I’ve yet gotten very far beyond this “poem, prose, & praise” from the year before.

That said, when I hear stories like the one I heard a couple months ago about a devout Muslim girl who moved closer to some Christians just to have some friends who actually believe in something, I get that too. And I don’t find these impulses contradictory.

Hard to say for sure that this isn’t a common tern, but signs point to an arctic tern. This guy was a little more spastic and uncertain, but his friends would dive from 3X this height. Loved watching these little John’s Bay dive bombers Monday afternoon.

Major Milestones • Monday, July 22nd 2024, 5:24 pm — Will’s first laughter at his own farts.

Good news, my boy. They will never stop being funny.

Currently Reading: The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down by Anne Fadiman 📚

The Hmong have a phrase, hais cuaj txub kaum txub, which means “to speak of all kinds of things.” It is often used at the beginning of an oral narrative as a way of reminding the listeners that the world is full of things that may not seem connected but actually are; that no event occurs in isolation; that you can miss a lot by sticking to the point; and that the storyteller is likely to be rather long-winded.… If a Hmong tells a fable, for example, about Why Animals Cannot Talk or Why Doodle Bugs Roll Balls of Dung, he is likely to begin with the beginning of the world.

And then what? — Moving from narrow to wide-boundary lenses.

Started and stopped reading: All Things Are Too Small by Becca Rothfeld 📚

Doubt I’ll pick it back up. I enjoyed the Commonweal interview with Rothfeld — at least I think I did; I’m only ever half paying attention to podcasts.

I think very often of a quote from one of CS Lewis’s essays, (wonderfully read by Ralph Cosham here):

When equality is treated not as a medicine or a safety-gadget but as an ideal we begin to breed that stunted and envious sort of mind which hates all superiority.…The man who cannot conceive a joyful and loyal obedience on the one hand, nor an unembarrassed and noble acceptance of that obedience on the other, the man who has never even wanted to kneel or to bow, is a prosaic barbarian.

Add minimalist tendencies to equality I suppose that’s what I expected to find — a praise for excess over minimalism and equality. But if that’s what Rothfeld is doing, it’s absolutely nothing like Lewis. The first essay not only shows no sign of Lewis’s sentiment, but seems to lack any sense of satisfaction or reverence at all.

Maybe I’m wrong, but I found no indication that this would improve through the book. And I’m too slow a reader to find out