📚 💬James Davison Hunter:

Like Schlesinger, [Walter] Lippmann recognized the instability of liberal democracy, an instability made more problematic by a general citizenry that had become, in effect, a mob with no capacity or even inclination for self-governance. Lippmann clearly had Senator McCarthy and his populist followers in mind. He found McCarthy’s demagoguery and campaign of fear utterly repellent and McCarthy himself an ambitious and ruthless agitator set on cultivating his following to become “a mere horde of frightened, angry, suspicious and suspected separate egos.” […]

Public opinion, as Lippmann argued, was now shaped by the techniques of mass communication and was therefore subject to manipulation through stereotypes, prejudices, and out-and-out propaganda. Ordinary citizens, then, had evolved into a mob because they had no “objective” understanding of their own interests and no capacity to act on them anyway. Worse still, no one could claim a privileged insight into or authoritative comprehension of the public good. The American public upon whose will democracy depended did not really exist. It was a fiction-in his own words, a “phantom.” […]

In Lippmann’s account, modern democracies had “abandoned the main concepts, principles, precepts, and the general manner of thinking” that characterize the public philosophy, and its cultural heritage had not been transmitted to recent generations. It was, then, essential to “revive,” “renew,” and “rework” the public philosophy for the modern age. The adaptation of its “common and binding principles was more necessary than it had ever been.” If this was not accomplished, then “the free and democratic nations face the totalitarian challenge without a public philosophy which free men believe in and cherish, with no public faith beyond a mere official agnosticism, neutrality and indifference."

…Lippmann found in his reading of Sartre “a proclamation of anarchy” that provides no framework of solidarity within a fragmented society, nor even a will to find any solidarity. The stripping away of any concept of a mind-independent truth creates a vacuum that is filled by “the intoxication of power,” an intoxication that is “the greatest danger of our time.” Indeed, he wrote, “any philosophy which, however unintentionally, contributes to it is increasing the danger of vast social disaster.”

Brickland

Vincent van Gogh to Emile Bernard:

Science — scientific reasoning — strikes me as being an instrument that will go a very long way in the future.

For look: people used to think that the earth was flat. That was true, and still is today, of, say, Paris to Asnières.

But that does not alter the fact that science demonstrates that the earth as a whole is round, something nobody nowadays disputes.

For all that, people still persist in thinking that life is flat and runs from birth to death.

But life, too, is probably round, and much greater in scope and possibilities than the hemisphere we now know.

The steeples of Bath

“Memories were not made to be beaten.”

    ~Kai Cheng Thom~

Ivo Andríc:

I listen carefully to all these discussions, both those between you two and other educated people in this town; also I read the newspapers and reviews. But the more I listen to you, the more I am convinced that the greater part of these spoken or written discussions have no connection with life at all and its real demands and problems. For life, real life, I look at from very close indeed; I see its influence on others and I feel it on myself. It may be that I am mistaken and that I do not know how to express myself well, but I often think that technical progress and the relative peace there is now in the world have created a sort of lull, a special atmosphere, artificial and unreal, in which a single class of men, the so-called intellectuals, can freely devote themselves to idleness and to the interesting game of ideas and ‘views on life and the world’. It is a sort of conservatory of the spirit, with an artificial climate and exotic flowers but without any real connection with the earth, the real hard soil on which the mass of human beings move. You think that you are discussing the fate of these masses and their use in the struggle for the realization of higher aims which you have fixed for them, but in fact the wheels which you turn in your heads have no connection with the life of the masses, nor with life in general. That game of yours becomes dangerous, or least might become dangerous, both for others and for you yourselves."

🍿Movie night last night. Finally found some time to sit down and watch All Illusions Must Be Broken. And wow. What a unique and needed film. See it. And make everyone you know see it.

I purchase books in such a way that I can walk up to my own bookshelf and say, “Ooo, I should read that!” 📚

Kim Hew-Low:

There is a certain permeability between art and life, and pleasure in perceiving it: We take satisfaction in recognizing our lives in onscreen plot lines, as we thrill to real-life moments that feel “just like a movie.” But TikTok’s video-based format has wildly amplified the impulse to collapse the distance between the two and imagine yourself as an onscreen character. The app’s tools make it easy for people to film and edit footage of themselves, narrating their own stories in breezy narrative beats — making life look like an episode of television. The result is a perfect ecosystem for watching and being watched, where once-passive audiences are encouraged to see themselves as the writers, directors and stars of their own motion pictures.

Charles Taylor:

To shut out demands emanating beyond the self is precisely to suppress the conditions of significance, and hence to court trivialization. To the extent that people are seeking a moral ideal here, this self-immuring is self-stultifying; it destroys the condition in which the ideal can be realized.

TikTok: destroying not just happiness, but even its very possibility.

But don’t let that stop you…

The sparrow and oriole stopping by for breakfast